You look at the specs of the current iPad Pros and it is easy to see Apple bumping the next version to say an 8 core (4 high performance, 4 low performance), probably 8 GB of RAM, etc. Yeah, it is why we can't have nice things for mobile! Many are just too cheap to pay for mobile apps. People also like to downplay that mobile devices are not powerful enough or just toys, that we should temper our enthusiasm for professional apps. ![]() People have become so ingrained that mobile apps should be free or cost next to nothing. ![]() I don't have any concrete stats to prove it, but I think iOS users are more willing to pay for more expensive apps but even that has limits. Again, I recommend it to people but the price tag gives them pause. LumaTouch makes LumaFusion, which is this really incredible video editing app for the iPad/iPhone that cost $20. But Serif has priced them at $20? And then they have sales where you can pick up Photo for $10? And yet I still have a hard time convincing people to take the plunge and buy Photo for iPad. I would gladly have paid the same $50 Desktop amount for Affinity Photo for iPad and the upcoming Affinity Designer for iPad. What? Exactly! How can you make any money in mobile development when people are so damn cheap. But then they look at the $5.99 price tag and frown. So great, you would think these buddies of mine would jump at the chance to buy FileBrowser. There is a bit of a learning curve but it makes getting files on and off the iPad/iPhone much more manageable (and even enjoyable). I use this little gem of an app to not only access my Dropbox, Google Drive but also any and all Hard Drives attached to either of my Mac Pros. Not to be outdone, I have friends that are iOS fanboys and when they complain about the new Files app in iOS 11 being disappointing, I point them to Stratospherix FileBrowser. I tell them about an app or game coming to Android, they look at the price tag and roll their eyes. In my experience it just seems like my Android loving friends are cheap bastards! I love my iPad Pro but I have had Samsung tablets in the past too. Mobile development is a tricky thing, and developers have my sympathy. Nothing has been said about any similar experience with Android, but it does not seem likely that at this time the costs would be the same for Serif. No details were given but it is reasonable to assume that by then, the company had considerable experience with developing (& marketing & supporting) both those OS's, plus a good start for IOS as well. The Windows versions were later derived from the Mac versions in what one of the developers described as porting them from the Mac OS to Windows. Even though the company sold only Windows apps at that time, they decided to run the project on that era's iPads & iOS versions because they did inherently have that limitation.Īs I am sure you know, iOS is not identical to the Mac OS but it does share enough similarities that that early work could be leveraged for the development of Designer for Mac. As you may or may not know, Affinity began as a research project at Serif to test the feasibility of developing a graphics app that would run acceptably on a device with severe limitations on the amount of memory available to applications. With Lightroom, you'll have to go into the settings and manually edit each one individually.If you are talking about the "Software Development Life Cycle" then it does not mater what operating system you develop for as the cost is the same.īut it does matter how much work has already been done on one or another OS. This is great news if you're someone who likes to change their photos regularly, or doesn't want to have to do that manually. One of the biggest differences is that Google Photos allows you to edit your images directly within their interface, so you don't need to go through the process of uploading them, then working out where they should go. Google Photos has many advanced features and provides a great photo editing experience.Įven though both these apps have some features in common, the way in which they have been designed goes a long way towards making them superior. It integrates with all of your other services such as Google+ and Gmail, so it's convenient to use all the same features on all your devices. ![]() Google offers unlimited storage space for paid accounts, while for free members you can store less than five hundred photos. You can easily upload new photos to the service and retrieve old photos from older ones. ![]() And, since your photos are automatically backed up by Google, there's no risk of losing any of them. It offers over 15GB of storage for each photo, which is easily the largest storage offered by other services. One of the biggest pros to using Google Photos for your photos is the storage and speed of the service.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |